Hackney Council received a number of requests to consider issuing a Tree Preservation Order for the trees in the current Horizon School from local residents and other people whose work or other daily routines bring them to the area.
In answer to one of the requests signed by several local residents the case council officer responded that he
appreciates the signatories' attachment to the trees and their effect on our views and the street', but Hackney are currently not planning to serve an order.
He then stressed
this is not because the trees do not warrant one but because, even with a TPO, the trees could still be removed if a planning permission allowed it; a planning permission over-rides a TPO,
and finally added
in this particular case my superiors are satisfied that a TPO is not yet expedient.
Our collective TPO request stressed the value of the trees and the green area around them for the local wildlife as well as the visual and aesthetic value of the trees, but the Council response entirely ignores this dimension of the residents' campaign to save the mature trees in Horizon school choosing to dismiss the request as merely one about views and attachment to the trees!
We are left wondering why then there is a department dealing with tree preservation orders if their decisions are by definition potentially redundant. Perhaps the department has a view on that?
1 comment:
I understand that, having heard more feedback to TPO requests, there is much concern in the department surrounding this development. The TPO people believe the proposed trees are in no way suitable for this plot and there is every justification for a TPO but, with a higher political will to drive these plans through they think a TPO would be a waste of money.
Post a Comment