Monday, 9 May 2011

Decision time: See you all at the Council Chamber, Hackney Town Hall, Mare Street on Thursday 12 May at 6.30

This Thursday, 12 May, the Hackney Council planning sub-committee will make its decision on whether to grant planning permission for the redevelopment of Horizon School.
The long, detailed (as well as misleading and inaccurate) report and recommendation put through by the planning department is at: www.hackney.gov.uk/planning-sub-committee . See pages 69-108 

The recommendation – the cynics among us won’t be surprised to hear – is to go ahead with NO concessions at all to local residents. That’s right, NOT ONE.

Please join your neighbours in the main council chamber of the Town Hall on Mare Street at 6.30pm to watch the sub-committee make the decision. Please ask your councillor or any other Hackney councillor you know to attend. We do hope that the sub-committee will stay true to the principles it alleges to hold dear: impartiality, fairness and transparency and will recognize the irregularities and misinformation that have tainted the consultation and application process.

Residents who object to the plans are given five glorious minutes to make their representations to the sub-committee. If you wish to speak you must notify Emma Perry 24 hours in advance:

Tuesday, 5 April 2011

Planning committee meets on 12 May

We're nearly there! We have a date of 12 May for the planning committee to make a decision on the redevelopment of Horizon school.
You still have a little time if you haven't already written your objection to the plans.
To help those of you who want to write but aren't sure what to say, we have outlined the broad concerns you have been expressing in meetings, emails and at your doorsteps. Pick whatever helps you and use it – if you can put it in your own words that's great, but if not – use these ones instead.
For your comments to be properly considered by the planning department, you need to get them in sooner rather than later though. Every comment makes a difference – especially a personal one from the heart.
You can email your objections to our planning officer: steve.andrews@hackney.gov.uk; do ask for an email acknowledgment.
The plans are on http://www.hackney.gov.uk/planning.htm plan number: 2011/0383. A paper copy (actually a huge  pile of papers!) is in Coffee Corner on the corner of Belgrade and Wordsworth Road as well.

What you have been telling us
In the plans we are being sold a landmark “civic building”. But it has no reference to the citizens who will have to live with it.
·       This small school site will double its intake and triple its staff (staff/pupil ratio will be 1:1). This will bring already significant traffic and noise levels beyond those acceptable in a dense residential area.
·       There will be around 300 people on site with all the deliveries, traffic, rubbish and noise this will bring with it.
·       The plans say it will bring in children from outside the borough for “revenue generation”, despite being told it needed to be that size for Hackney’s children.
·       The whole plan is too large and extravagant for the available land and has been designed around building a road to drop children off rather than educational requirements.
·       The site is so dense there is no room for any future change of remit (the history of the school is that it changes its intake criteria regularly).
·       A proposed “light installation” will drown the neighbouring houses in light every night till 11pm and be 10 times stronger than the light from the adjacent houses to create an art feature! (See Design and Access statement Appendix 7)
   * The density of the planned new building means:
- Around 30 trees will be cut down. This is not supported by Hackney’s own TPO department and according to them, plans to replace with new mature trees are unrealistic and unworkable.
- A road being built into the school land to drop off the children will bizarrely double as a playground. The road will accommodate at least 7 buses twice daily and additional transport throughout the day – despite earlier assurances to the contrary. This will include refuse trucks and kitchen deliveries for 300 people.
- Five parking spaces will go on Prince George Road simply to accommodate the turning circle of these huge trucks.
- There are 10 parking spaces allocated for the 150 staff on site.
- Almost all the open and green space (which we enjoy and daily see Horizon pupils enjoying) will be built over. The children will have almost nowhere to run around.
- The drop-off road is directly adjacent to residents’ tiny gardens (which are only 10-foot long) so psychologically and physically hems in locals’ back gardens. It exits back onto the residential road alongside houses, where currently there is open green space.
- The entirely new huge facade of the school on Prince George Road (currently an open green play area) will dominate a very narrow street of modest Victorian houses.
- The existing residential road (currently with no school entrance) already struggles with heavy traffic usage and there is a history of problems and road rage. Residents’ parking bays will be decreased and a new loading facility (used daily for the school) will take the place of other spaces.
- There has never been a “moving traffic” survey done – in other words no proper traffic plan has been developed despite the huge increase in staff and pupils; despite being told the new road will be used throughout the day; despite the loss of parking to accommodate the buses turning onto the small street.
- A roof garden is planned, which will breach privacy and add yet more height to the buildings with railings that aren’t shown on the plans. This has been added at the eleventh hour and without any consultation. We can only infer that this is to create more outside space lacking in the design.
- The statutory bat survey was not done properly – in fact it was done in December when bats are hibernating!

- The plans take no account of the tree preservation orders that have been granted, which is another example of residents views simply being ignored.

Tuesday, 22 March 2011

Why is the school so BIG? not because of Hackney children

Here's what BSF says:  'As part of its strategy for SEN provision in the Borough, the Learning Trust are looking to attract SEN pupils from adjacent Boroughs [i.e., students whose local authorities will pay]. The school is being designed to a capacity at 150 pupils which allows for the impact of this policy on pupil numbers.'



And this
  • at the expense of the school's own pupils who will be corralled in small outdoors spaces
  • at the expense of the local community which will be overwhelmed by a huge building, considerable environmental degradation, increased traffic, decreased parking spaces
Money over pupils' interests and needs, the quality of life of the local community, over scores of felled trees and the destruction of a local ecosystem squeezed by commercial and housing development, traffic and environmental degradation.



Sunday, 20 March 2011

Biodiversity? You must be joking!






Through a local resident's Freedom of Information request we now know that Mouchel (the contractors) have had prior consultation with Hackney's Biodiversity Officer, who didn't raise any concerns about a proper survey for bats and nesting birds. We are astonished to hear that given the fact that all of us have seen the green and open spaces of Horizon School being frequented by all sorts of wildlife from foxes to bats, birds, moths and all sorts of insects.
Rethink the Horizon School plans

A plan is proposed by BSF and Hackney Council to demolish Horizon School and replace it with a significantly enlarged school on the existing site. The proposals are at the Planning stage with Hackney Council.


It will mean:
•significant reduction of children's' outdoor play area
•destruction of thirty mature trees, currently covered by a tree preservation order
•a new access road running through the playground, which will exit onto Prince George Road
•a new drop-off point for children and deliveries on Prince George Road
•a significant increase in traffic, resulting in congestion and noise
•loss of parking spaces.

SIGN THE PETITION TO RETHINK THE PLANS AND HAVE A SCHOOL FIT FOR ITS PUPILS AND EMBRACED BY THE COMMUNITY



Traffic what Traffic?

We received the following message by one of the local residents. It contains important information about the planning application and the astonishing claims put forward by both Hackney Council and the Developers. In the interest of transparency we reproduce it verbatim here:
 
You might think the planning application has a survey of 'traffic'. You'd be WRONG.

There is no survey of moving vehicles. Why?

Because in June 2010, Hackney's Department of Transportation met with Mouchel, the developer, and decided that that the new school would make no impact on neighbourhood traffic. Therefore the Traffic Assessment didn't have to include 'traffic' (moving vehicles) but only parking. The Transportation people told Mouchel they'd be 'happy to discuss' any traffic issues as they went along so that there were no 'surprises' that could affect the outcome of the Horizon planning application

1. So, the required 'Traffic Assessment' was done by Mouchel, Hackney's contractor, for Hackney's planning application. How many conflicts of interest can you spot there.

2. Hackney's Department of Transport decided that Hackney's application for planning permission didn't have to discuss or survey moving traffic. This is like Hackney deciding its own case.


Furthermore, it also says is that it doesn't matter what the residents think about the traffic. The matter has already been decided without leaving the office - there is no impact on traffic.

3. If I recall correctly, beginning in September, we were always told that there would be a full survey of traffic. But from June they already knew that there wouldn't be.

Stakeholders should object to all of this in the strongest possible terms.


It gets worse!

Not only did they imply at the meeting that there would be a survey of moving vehicles but they've changed the minutes to correct their lie.

The September meeting was attended by Tim Parker and Stephanie Howard from Mouchel Transport. Tim Parker, was the one who met with Hackney Transport and agreed their deal.

transparency [trænsˈpærənsɪ]: frankness, openness, candour, directness, forthrightness, straightforwardness e.g. openness and transparency in the government's decision-making
At the meeting the woman spoke. I asked her 3 questions. I remeber this quite clearly because I was irritated at her slippery answers. She said they'd done some preliminary studies, on questioning it turned out these were about parking. I am 100% clear that my final question was: have you surveyed 'moving vehicles'? She said no but they would. This is as everyone would expect.

The minutes say I asked only the following question: 'Has a transport assessment been carried out'. (That of course is not what the question was.)

She answers, 'No but will be as part of the stage 2 work'.

The reason they fiddled the minutes this is that technically speaking they have carried out a Transport Assessment, which is the document we have, and based on their deal with Hackney, they didn't have to survey moving vehicles.

Wednesday, 16 March 2011

How you can comment on the Horizon planning application

You have 21 days from the date on the notification letter, site notice
or press advertisement to comment on an application.
Comments can be made by anyone and can be objections, support,
or observations about the application.

You can make your comments either by:
• going online at http:// www.hackney.gov.uk/search-applications,
• writing a letter,
• completing the submission form that is sent with the notification letter,
• sending a fax,
• emailing planningconsultation@hackney.gov.uk

What you can comment on

Hackney Planners can only take into account material planning considerations.
These cover a wide range of issues including –
• loss of privacy,
• loss of trees,
• loss of daylight,
• visual appearance,
• traffic generation and road safety,
• noise or smell,
• something contrary to Council policy and/or London Plan policy,
• impact on Listed Buildings and/or Conservation Areas,
• impact of increased activity.

Matters that are not material to planning application assessment
and cannot be considered are –

• requirements under building regulations or other non-planning laws
such as structural stability, fire precaution or the like,
• private issues between neighbours such as party wall disputes,
damage to property, private rights of way, covenants or the like,
• commercial competition,
• property values,
• loss of a view,
• alternative types of development you might prefer.


Submit your Comment
Email: planningconsultation@hackney.gov.uk
On-line: www.hackney.gov.uk/planning
Write to: Hackney Planning Service, 2 Hillman Street, London E8 1FB
Other Contact Information
Phone: 020 8356 3000 – General Enquiries
Fax: 020 8356 8110